web analytics

Dagworthy dispute on Chain of Command

.

.

Colonel Washington is on his way to personally talk to Governor Shirley, who was given the command of all North American forces.  

.

The issue to be resolved is chain of command.

.

Maryland’s Captain Dagworthy insisted his old, expired British commission, entitled him to rank over any colonial Colonel ( such as Washington) or Lt Colonel (such as Adam Stephen).

.

.

.


This looks like William Shirley

Solved the Chain of Command Dispute


.

From William Shirley

Boston March 5th 1756

Governor Dinwiddie at the Instance of Colonel Washington having referred to me concerning the right of Command, between him and Capt. Dagworthy, and desiring that I would determine it, I do therefore give it as my Opinion that Capt. Dagworthy who now acts under a Commission from the Governor of the Province of Maryland, and where there are no regular Troops join’d, can only take Rank as Provincial Captain and of Course is under the Command of all Provincial Field Officers, and in case it shall happen, that Col. Washington and Capt. Dagworthy should join at Fort Cumberland. It is my Orders that Colonel Washington should take the Command.1

W. Shirley

.

1. One of GW’s main purposes in going to Boston was to persuade Governor Shirley as the senior officer of the British forces in America to put an end to what GW considered the outrageous pretensions of Capt. John Dagworthy of the Maryland forces. Now that he had in writing Shirley’s instructions in the matter, GW henceforth would be able to go to Fort Cumberland without running the risk of Dagworthy’s claiming superior rank to the provincial colonel’s by virtue of a putative royal commission as captain in the British army. That there be no further misunderstanding about this, Shirley wrote on 5 Mar. to Dagworthy’s superior, Gov. Horatio Sharpe: “I must desire that Capt. Dagworthy may be removed from Fort Cumberland; or acquainted that if he remains there, he must put himself under the Command of Colonel Washington” (Browne, Sharpe Correspondence, 1:347–48). For information about GW’s differences with Dagworthy, see particularly Adam Stephen to GW, 4 Oct. 1755, n.6.

.

Source

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/02-02-02-0321

About Us History Explore & Learn Join & Support News & Events
Our Story War Timeline Visit Join Us! Calendar
Board of Directors Fort Loudoun Tour Donate Press
Contact Us Additional Forts Resources Volunteer Newsletters
  Baker-Hardy House Essay Contest Shop Archive